谢谢你转来前面报道的出处article（发表时间相当，也Spain，相信你，应该是这个了）。
纠正一下前面，是使用“硅”来标签的。我原来也怀疑intron标码做法，因为是传统做法，发表已经没多少新意（当然原文也没提到）。根据你提供的，我就再多解释一下：
1.研究目的：the objective of this study was to provide a proof of concept for a direct embryo labeling system using silicon-based barcodes。提供一个直接的胚胎标签以使用硅为基础的条码实验的新观念。
2. 试验结果：Our results demonstrate the feasibility of a direct embryo labeling system and constitute the starting point in the development of such systems.我们的研究结果证明了胚胎直接标签的可行性，它可能成为了这种实验方法的发展起点。
3.问题：The majority of embryos (>90%) retained at least one of the microinjected barcodes in their perivitelline space up to the blastocyst stage. Increasing the number of barcodes per embryo resulted in a significant increase in embryo identification rates, but a significant decrease in the barcode release rates after embryo hatching.在母细胞到囊胚阶段，大部分胚胎（“90％）保留了至少一条注射条码。注射条码数量有增加趋向，保证了胚胎识别，但在胚胎孵化后阶段注射条码释放明显下降。
I'm sorry, i waited your ideas more interesting and more creative.
your opnion is also subjective, 防止类似黑人夫妇人工受精生出个白孩子来这种错误come rather of the same place-the terme of article-than of the astract, as everyone did in here.
i wait your laughing at me, not good in english etc , i prefre to answer you, although i've not condition to type as clear as on chinese. i can also tell you, i am not really in biology, it just intrested me.
excuse me, i don't like 总体来说我觉得楼主完全是哗众取宠，连文章都没看明白就瞎嚷嚷. everybody can talk here, we are here for listening and learning.
I'm sorry, i waited your ideas more interesting and more creative.
long story with lz, i am just tired of getting into this kind of discussion with him, no offence to you at all.
actually, if you are not in bio, it is amazing that you got all the intron things right (i have to say, unlike the lz here (and everywhere else)), my honor to response to you more seriously in the future.
if you are interested in bio, pls just ignore this kind of intepretation by media, and intepretation of intepretation, and intepretation of intepretation of intepretation... if you want to know the true news in bio, i recommend you the podcast from nature and science (totally cool news).
BACKGROUND Measures to prevent assisted reproductive technologies (ART) mix-ups, such as labeling of all labware and double-witnessing protocols, are currently in place in fertility clinics worldwide. Technological solutions for electronic witnessing are also being developed. However, none of these solutions eliminate the risk of identification errors, because gametes and embryos must be transferred between containers several times during an ART cycle.
楼主 
